SafetyDog

Culture transformation Thursday : power and deviance

In Patient Safety on October 21, 2015 at 12:11 pm

There are some interesting leadership behaviors that can occur in an unsupportive workplace environment. When a leader gets frustrated with lack of progress on an initiative or overall group day to day performance they can attempt to regain control by exerting power (kind of like parenting?  “because I am your mother thats why!”).

There is a theory of how employees repond to this (Sims, 2010):

  1. Leader Display of Power
  2. Employee becomes frustrated… might product feelings of threats to autonomy/social identity and feelings of injustice
  3. Two options:

1) Employee accepts this

2) Employee rejects the display of power by:

  1. a) displaying exit behaviors which can be physical or emotional (eg. leave the group or physically stay but become disengaged).
  2. b) using the employee voice: which is productive if its internal and listened to and used to find a better solution or non-productive if the voice is ignored or used outside of the group to bad mouth the leader or the group in general

A group who perceives this cycle to be repeating over and over(even if its not true), eventually may adopt a deviant culture where negative organizational behaviors become the norm.  When this happens even internally motivated, self-regulated individuals can conform to socialization.  In general, people need to feel a sense of equity: that the reward they get from work matches the effort they put out (Henle, 2005). Rewards are more than just money. They can be respect, acknowledgement, educational opportunities, a good schedule, gratitude from patients/customers, etc…In times of budget restriction, the rewards for employees are usually reduced and the work demands are increased, thus creating a potentially harmful mismatch.

One of the mediators of workplace deviance is interactional justice.  In a leader this would mean treating all with sensitivity, dignity and respect and giving adequate explanations for decisions made AND taking ownership for decisions made. Staff experience more frustration if they feel their leader does not agree with an organizational decision but is powerless to fix it. Senior leadership has an obligation to give their middle managers adequate explanations and a list of talking points to help disseminate the information. If the decision does not have a valid explanation maybe it is not the right decision!  There are many psychological biases inherent in leadership decision-making that can compromise effective operational strategy.

Another mediator of workplace deviance is to have leader and employee goals that match.  It is important to understand employee workplace goals. A good leader will help the employee discover how their goals can align with the organizational goals or in a case where there might be a poor fit and the goals do not align, coach the employee to seek an alternate environment.

Those employees whose goals do align can be used to create positive deviance within the group.  Involve them in projects that fit with their goals. Eventually the norms of the group will change and become more aligned with the organizational goals creating benefit for the organization and engagement in the employees.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: